Elodie Maretta

Business Operations & Organizational Management

About Me

I help growing companies build structured operations, create scalable processes and transform complex organizations into efficient, data-driven businesses.

With 4+ years of experience in business operations, team management and process improvement, I build systems that improve execution, strengthen accountability and give leaders greater visibility without pulling them back into daily operations.

My Journey

From Coordination to Operational Leadership.

My responsibilities evolved from project coordination to business-unit structuring, team leadership, KPI management and operational improvement.

2021

Project Coordinator

Planning, execution, client communication and first process design.

2022

Senior Project Coordinator / Logistics Manager

Purchasing, stock, supply planning, forecasting and logistics performance.

2023–2025

Team Manager / Project & Business Operations

Business Unit management, team leadership, production, reporting, KPI and continuous improvement.

Current

Manager of Organizations — RNCP Level 7 in Progress

Recognition based on my operational and organizational management experience.

€500K+

Revenue Managed

Monthly business-unit revenue, priorities and operational reporting.

5–10

Team Leadership

Management rituals, objectives, coaching and accountability.

37% → 0%

Logistics Anomaly Reduction

Reduced to zero over two months after designing and implementing a stronger process.

<2.5%

Monthly Anomaly Rate

Maintained through training, process control and continuous monitoring.

Case Study 01

Building a Management Framework from Scratch

Context

  • First Team Manager role
  • No formal framework
  • Different working habits
  • Turnover risk

My Role

  • Lead 5 coordinators
  • Support up to 10 people
  • Set priorities
  • Develop autonomy

What I Implemented

  • Weekly meetings
  • Monthly one-to-ones
  • Individual and collective goals
  • Adaptive leadership

Results

  • Lower turnover
  • Higher engagement
  • More accountability
  • Better service quality

Case Study 02

Managing a High-Pressure Telecom Business Unit

Context

  • High-volume activity
  • Frequent process changes
  • Daily reprioritization
  • Strong SLA pressure

My Role

  • Production responsibility
  • Business Unit coordination
  • Revenue tracking
  • Account strategy contribution

What I Implemented

  • Backlog management
  • Resource allocation
  • Change communication
  • Operational dashboards

Results

  • Client satisfaction above 85%
  • 70% same-day production absorption
  • Anomalies below 2.5%
  • Additional projects awarded

Production Dashboard

Planning Rate

86%

Deployment Rate

78%

Critical Backlog

Previous-Day Files12
Immediate Urgent Files3

Revenue Progress

€395K
Target: €500K
79%

Quality & Service Dashboard

Monthly Client Feedback

95%
Monthly client score

Planning Lead Time

5
Business Days

Internal Processing Time

1
Business Day

Monthly Anomaly Rate

<2.5%
Processes, training and monitoring

Case Study 03

Building Processes, KPI and Continuous Improvement

Context

  • Instructions dispersed by email
  • Recurring questions
  • Inconsistent execution
  • Few structured KPI

My Role

  • Map workflows
  • Analyze anomalies
  • Build corrective actions
  • Create dashboards

What I Implemented

  • Root-cause analysis
  • Internal/external classification
  • Owner and deadline tracking
  • Process redesign

Results

  • Fewer errors
  • Higher autonomy
  • Faster resolution
  • Data-based decisions
Anomaly Detected
Measure Impact
Identify Root Cause
Internal or External?
Define Corrective Action
Assign Owner & Deadline
Update Workflow
Train & Communicate
Measure Results
Continuous Improvement

Case Study 04

Securing Logistics and Operational Continuity

Context

  • Rapid volume increase
  • Process too light
  • Late stock issues
  • Cancelled intervention risk

My Role

  • Take over the crisis
  • Coordinate partners
  • Negotiate prices
  • Redesign the workflow

What I Implemented

  • Designed a stronger logistics process
  • Stock verification
  • Equipment reservation
  • Tracking and receipt controls

Results

  • 37% → 3% → 0%
  • Earlier issue detection
  • Better continuity
  • More scalable operations

Logistics-Caused Failures After Process Implementation

37%Month 0
3%Month 1
0%Month 2

Process Controls Added

  • Stock verification before scheduling
  • Equipment reservation
  • Shipment tracking validation
  • Safety buffer before intervention
  • Technician receipt confirmation
  • Fallback solution in case of shortage

Communication Strategy — Applied Case Study

The Right Information, to the Right Person, for the Right Decision.

These systems were used to analyze client-reported anomalies, correct internal issues, improve team practices and provide clear management visibility.

Client + Internal

COMOP

For Whom?
Client Project Managers, operational teams and managers
Why?
Analyze and justify anomalies, then define corrective actions
Output
Cause analysis, action plan, owners and deadlines

Client Management

COPIL

For Whom?
Client management and business-unit management
Why?
Review KPI, volume, deadlines, quality and satisfaction
Output
Strategic decisions and account priorities

Executive

GOR

For Whom?
Executive team and management
Why?
Provide a concise operational health view
Output
Alerts, KPI, decisions required and next priorities

Daily — Team

Team Daily Update

For Whom?
Operational team
Why?
Review priorities, blockers and urgent support needs
Output
Clear owners, deadlines and actions

Daily — Executive

Executive Daily Update

For Whom?
Executives and management
Why?
Provide KPI dashboard and key alerts for information
Output
Concise visibility without operational overload

COMOP — Anomaly Analysis

Possible Anomaly Distribution

Internal ProcessClient InputLogisticsField / Technician

Anomaly Volume by Cause

COPIL — KPI Review

Client Satisfaction

Target> 85%
Result95%

Internal Processing Time

Client Target2 Business Days
Result1 Business Day

Planning Lead Time

Reference5 Business Days
Result5 Business Days

Monthly Anomaly Rate

Reference2.5%
Result1.3%

GOR — Executive Team View

GREEN

On track. No executive action required.

ORANGE

At risk. Monitoring or support required.

RED

Blocked. Executive decision required.

Internal Escalation Matrix

A clear escalation structure ensures that the right stakeholder receives the right information and can make the appropriate decision quickly.

Level 1 — Project Coordinator
Level 2 — Team Manager / Operations Manager
Level 3 — Executive Management

Executive Daily Update — Email Format

To: Executive Team   ·   Subject: Daily Operations Update
Daily KPI Snapshot & Key Alerts
86%Planning Rate
78%Deployment Rate
3Immediate Alerts
Alert: Three urgent files require same-day attention. No executive decision is needed unless the issue remains unresolved by the operational team.
“My goal is to create enough structure for teams to move faster, while giving leaders the visibility they need without pulling them back into daily operations.”